Today’s #edchat discussion on Twitter was all about training kids as critical thinkers. I believe that we are losing students as critical thinkers because in our current model of education, where we are standardizing education with tests, we teach kids that there is one correct answer to every question. We limit their thinking to what we have already determined is an acceptable answer to the question. This is extremely limiting. Critical thinking means that we aren’t satisfied with the easy answer, we think about multiple solutions to the problem and even think of additional questions. We approach a problem differently, more creatively.
In today’s TED Talk, Tim Brown talks about his journey in design and his tendency to think about problems on a small scale, limiting himself to the obvious answers and a single solution. Design wasn’t always this way, design used to be big. Design thinking solves problems and works to create world changing innovations. It seems to me that there is a strong correlation with what Tim refers to as Design Thinking and what we call critical thinking. Roger Martin calls this integrative thinking, the ability to exploit opposing ideas and opposing constraints to create new solutions. Isn’t this what we are asking our students to do when we are looking for critical thinking? What we really want students to do is think as designers. When I watch children who haven’t yet entered the classroom, I notice a strong correlation between the way a child thinks and the way a designer thinks. They are questioners, tinkerers, and are never satisfied with one solution.
Design thinking could be our model for critical thinking in the classroom, but beyond that design thinking could be our solution to reform in education. Exploiting opposing ideas and opposing constraints to create new solutions.
Design is human centered, it starts with what humans need or might need. It means understanding culture and context. From destination to active participation that is meaningful and productive. Value is added through collaborative experiences and not through monetary gains alone (think Twitter). In times of change we need new thinking and new ideas. We are in the midst of massive change and we need to rethink what we accept as basic fundamentals. We need new choices because our current options are becoming obsolete. We need to take a divergent approach and come up with something that hasn’t been done before. What is the question we are trying to answer? What is the design brief for education.
The first step is to start asking the right questions. (I think #edchat does an honorable job of this!) What are the right questions?
Hi Kelly,
You helped me out so much in my first year of teaching that when I saw this video I thought you might enjoy, I decided to pass it along.
I’m a big David Mitchell fan (he’s a British actor and comedian), so I try to catch his new Soap Box video every week in the summer. It’s basically just him sounding off for about 3-4 minutes on whatever random thing has struck him in the past week. This week’s topic is “references,” and he talks about how/why children’s television doesn’t cater to children’s curiosity. It’s not as lengthy or as scholarly as a Ted Talk, but it might be worth viewing on a Webspiration Wednesday.
Anyway, here’s the link. Hope it’s useful!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/video/2010/jun/17/david-mitchell-soap-box-references
Thanks for the suggestion Amanda!